What America Missed When India and Europe Cut a Historic Trade Deal
- Stephania Chopra
- Jan 28
- 3 min read
An analysis of the India–EU Free Trade Agreement and its wider geopolitical significance
After nearly two decades of negotiation, India and the European Union (EU) signed a landmark free trade agreement (FTA). While much attention has focused on tariff reductions and market access, the deeper significance of the deal goes far beyond traditional economics especially in how it was shaped by global trade pressures and shifting geopolitical priorities.

Why This Deal Isn’t Just About Tariffs
At first glance, this agreement may seem like a regular trade pact: both sides agree to reduce duties on thousands of products and services, opening up one of the largest markets in the world. But the real story lies in its strategic context.
Before this deal, most Indian exports to Europe already faced very low tariffs, with around three‑quarters of goods attracting tariffs below 1%. In contrast, India applied much higher duties on some European imports especially automobiles, wines, and machinery. On paper, this seemed like a one-sided liberalisation.
However, economists and geopolitical experts argue that tariff numbers alone don’t capture the true value of the agreement. The real impact comes from how it restructures trade flows and reduces dependence on markets where trade has become politically unpredictable.
Trade Diversion and Re‑Routing
Historically, India’s trade architecture included agreements with ASEAN, Japan, and Korea, leading to tariff cuts that looked comprehensive but often didn’t translate into better market access because of non‑tariff barriers abroad. This limited real export growth.
At the same time, higher US tariffs especially under recent trade policies significantly changed global trade incentives. Indian goods faced duties as high as 50% in the United States, affecting sectors like auto parts, gems and jewellery, marine products, and machinery. Meanwhile, European markets remained more stable and predictable.
Rather than seeing the agreement simply as tariff cuts, many analysts describe it as a formalisation of existing trade rerouting, where Indian exports that were previously heading to the US or other markets began shifting toward the EU. For example, as data from late 2025 shows, while Indian exports of certain goods to the US declined sharply, exports to the EU and other regions increased or remained stable.
More Than Goods: Services and Economic Security
The deal goes deeper than tariffs. It includes commitments in services across many sectors, investment protections, and frameworks for professional mobility. These elements build confidence for businesses and investors that India and the EU will operate under predictable, binding rules rather than ad‑hoc trade conditions.
One notable aspect is how the agreement anticipates future regulatory shifts for instance, on carbon emissions and environmental standards. Instead of engaging in future disputes over carbon-related tariffs, the trade pact includes mechanisms to reduce uncertainty and encourage cooperation on technical standards.
Geopolitical Undercurrents: A Hedge Against Coercion
Perhaps the most talked-about interpretation is that this pact reflects a strategic pivot away from over-reliance on any single global power. With recent trade tensions between the US and its partners over tariffs and geopolitical disagreements, both India and Europe saw value in strengthening their own economic ties.
For Europe, stronger engagement with India helps diversify trade and reduce dependence on dominant supply chains. For India, the deal offers predictable market access and reduced exposure to political or tariff shocks in other regions. Critics in the United States have described the agreement as “a hedge against coercion,” highlighting how it may serve to balance global economic pressures.
Key Takeaways for the Global Economy
Trade Agreements Are More Than Numbers
The India–EU FTA shows that international trade deals are not just about tariff rates; they are about shaping long-term economic routes and security.
Geopolitics Drives Economics
Pressure from tariff policies and global uncertainties pushed India and the EU closer together. The result is not just cheaper trade but strategic alignment between major economies.
A Multipolar World in Practice
This deal reflects a broader shift toward multipolar economic relations, where countries seek diversified partnerships rather than depending on one dominant power.
Final Thoughts
The India–EU trade agreement may be hailed as a milestone in commercial policy, but its deeper significance lies in how it reflects changing global priorities. It is a pact shaped not just by tariff tables, but by shifting incentives, strategic hedging, and evolving global relationships.



Comments